August 2022 – https://spotifyanchor-web.app.link/e/DJuG3C2VMsb
Shownotes
Clinical Snippets August 2022
1. Pediatric Sepsis
- The febrile and non-specifically unwell child is a common presentation in primary care. Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the paediatric population and can be very challenging to diagnose and manage.
- For every hour a child remains in septic shock the mortality risk doubles. Care delivered in the first hour after presentation or sepsis identification is crucial in ensuring the optimum outcome for the patient.
- Considering a diagnosis of sepsis and assessing for red and amber flags at triage is important. The Prehospital Paediatric Sepsis Screening and Action Toolprovided by Sepsis Trust NZ may be a useful resource to guide triage and assessment activity.
- Additional risk stratification tools developed by NICE are available via a BPAC article onSepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early managementpublished in 2018. There are separate algorithms for children aged under 5 years, 5-11 years and 12 – 17 years.
- Recommendations include: Think ‘could this be sepsis?’ if a child presents with signs or symptoms that indicate possible infection…. Assess temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, level of consciousness, oxygen saturation and capillary refill time in children under 12 years with suspected sepsis.
- The more general NICE ‘traffic light’ system for Identifying the risk of serious illness in children with fever was published in 2007. A recent study analysing utility of the system concluded: The majority of children presenting to UK primary care with acute undifferentiated illness meet red or amber NICE traffic light criteria, with only 6% classified as low risk, making it unfit for use in general practice. A second study looking at accuracy of the system for identifying children at risk of serious illness concluded the system did not accurately detect children admitted with a serious illness, nor those not seriously ill who could have been managed at home. This system is not suitable for use as a clinical tool in general practice.
- The Pedicalc website (ED orientated) has calculators that facilitate rapid calculation of drug doses that might be required in various paediatric emergency situations.
2. Actinic keratoses (AK)
- A recent Dermatology Research Review article notes that the chance of any given AK evolving into invasive SCC is small (1:45 or around 2% for a mild early lesion and up to 20% for a severe or thick lesion). Efudix® is superior to imiquimod in clearing these due to its superior keratotic tissue penetration. It is not surprising that a thick lesion would require more treatment and topical treatment in that setting may not regress malignant progression. The take-home message is that patients with thicker lesions require closer more frequent monitoring and a low threshold for surgery of poorly responding lesions.
- A 2022 systematic review of use of calcipotriol with Efudix for field treatment of AK observed the combination led to greater reduction in AK, a higher percentage of patients achieving complete clearance, and less risk of progression to squamous cell carcinoma, but more burning and severe erythema. The recommended duration of treatment is around four days (applied twice daily).
- An older BPAC article gives recommendations (and scary images) of how to use Efudix and imiquimod for non-melanoma skin cancer in a general practice setting and is a useful resource. It does not cover the Calcipotriol/Efudix combination however.
3. Assisted Dying update
The Assisted Dying Service – Ngā Ratonga Mate Whakaahuru annual report has recently been released covering the period 7 November 2021 to 31 March 2022. Between those dates 206 people formally applied for assisted dying. As of 31 March:
- 66 people had an assisted death
- 59 people were still in the process of assessment or preparation for assisted dying
- 81 people did not continue the process (due to being ineligible, withdrawing or dying of
their condition)
- 6% of people that applied for assisted dying are Māori and 79% are NZ European/Pākehā, 55% were women, 74% were aged 65 years or older and 65% had a cancer diagnosis
- 80% of applicants for assisted dying were receiving palliative care at the time of application.
- Location of the assisted dying process was 73% at the person’s home or another private residence, 17% in aged care facilities, 6% in district health board facilities and 4% in hospice facilities
- A majority of people (85%) chose injection delivered by the attending medical or nurse practitioner
- The Secretariat received four complaints over this period, three of which were resolved and one of which was referred to HDC. Issues include: a practitioner’s interpersonal style and
Communication; Delay in being connected with an attending medical practitioner; Disagreement with a finding of ineligibility; Poor experience of the process in a public hospital.
4. Change in shingles vaccination
- PHARMAC has announced that Shingrix will be replacing Zostavax on the National Immunisation Schedule and will be funded for those in their 65th year of life. Shingrix will be available for order only once all stocks of Zostavax are exhausted. This is expected to occur in August or September.
- Shingrix is a two-dose schedule with a 2–6-month gap between doses. As long as the person being vaccinated is 65 when they receive their first dose, both doses will be funded. At this stage, there will be no catch-up programme for this vaccine, it will simply take the place of Zostavax.
- The effectiveness of Shingrix does not decrease when given to older age groups (with an efficacy of around 90% against zoster and PHN), so those aged over 70 years will also be protected and a high level of protection (over 80%) has been shown to be maintained for more than seven years, so far.
- Per IMAC: Shingrix may be offered to individuals who previously had Zostavax and/or has a history of zoster episodes. Allow 12 months between Zostavax or after an episode of zoster has resolved before giving Shingrix. There are no safety concerns around giving it sooner but since the immune system will have been activated against the varicella-zoster virus by these events, there is likely to be little additional short-term benefit for most people. Shingrix can be given sooner, from 3 months after a zoster episode has resolved or prior Zostavax dose, for individuals who are immunocompromised and at increased risk of zoster recurrence.
5. Treating fever
A recent edition of the BMJ contained a meta-analysis and systematic review of 42 clinical trials looking at fever therapy in febrile adults. The trials assessed antipyretic medicines (mainly paracetamol and ibuprofen), physical cooling and combination treatment v.s. no fever treatment or placebo, in patients with fever who were critically ill, non-critically ill, with and without infectious illness. There was no evidence that fever therapy reduced the risk of death or the risk of serious adverse events; conversely there is no evidence that fever therapy increases these risks. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether fever therapy influences quality of life or non-serious adverse events – we can’t even say for certain that at least it will make the patient feel better!
A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis on use of antipyretics for preventing recurrence of febrile seizures in children concluded there was weak evidence suggesting a possible role in preventing febrile seizure recurrence within the same fever episode but there is clearly no role for antipyretic prophylaxis in preventing febrile seizures during distant fever episodes.
6. PrEP update
- From 1 July 2022 access to emtricitabine with tenofovir disoproxil (TD/FTC) for pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV (PrEP) was widened to allow more people access to treatment for PrEP. The approval period was also extended and criteria that relate to monitoring and testing were removed from the SA. This means the criteria will only require the prescriber to confirm that the patient is HIV negative, that they consider the patient is at elevated risk of HIV exposure and that use of PrEP is clinically appropriate. Pharmac estimate that initially up to an additional 3500 people per year will be able to access PrEP as a result of this change, increasing to 5500 people per year in the next five years.
- The new SA criteria for initiation of PrEP read:
Initial application from any relevant practitioner. Approvals valid for 24 months for applications meeting the following criteria:
Both:
- Patient has tested HIV negative, does not have signs or symptoms of acute HIV infection and has been assessed for HIV seroconversion; and
- The Practitioner considers the patient is at elevated risk of HIV exposure and use of PrEP is clinically appropriate.
It is important to have a working knowledge of prescribing options, and pre-prescribing assessment and surveillance/follow-up requirements. There are multiple useful resources available to assist with this:
- NZ Guidelines for use of PrEP on the Australasian Society for HIV Medicine (ASHM) website
- 2019 BPAC article on prescribing PrEP
- A two page quick access guide on PrEP prescribing in NZ
- A one pager from Canterbury DHB on ongoing testing and surveillance requirements and considerations for patients taking PrEP
- Pharmac training resources on various aspects of HIV including PrEP perscribing
- Extensive on-line information resource for patients considering or taking PrEP
